Knife Company History- There is nothing new under the sun

Antique knife collectors are some of the most enthusiastic knife fans. We can squeeze significance from every discovered factoid about an old knife company or pattern. We appreciate and embrace knife history, as if it were our own family’s heritage. We are simply crazy about old knives and the older the better too.

Yet, antique knives have one inherent problem and we collectors can get down in the mouth about it- claiming it to be a byproduct of the modern-era we now live in with folks having access to high-tech equipment and modern knife making methods.

A Bit of Counterfeiting History

The problem I am talking about is counterfeiting- monkeying with knives in order to cause buyers to believe they are something they are not.

Contrary to what most collectors believe, counterfeiting knives is not a modern-day phenomenon. As a matter of fact, it started before many of the knives we now collect were even made.

“So who are these old time counterfeiters?”  Well, would it surprise you if some of the early culprits were actually American knife companies? Shocking assertion, isn’t it?

American Brands on Foreign Knives

The problem got so bad, in fact, the manager of Oakman Bros. Co. of New York, a large distributor of Lamson & Goodnow, wrote a letter to the editor of The American Cutler dated March 12, 1909.

He reports, “Some American manufacturers are buying goods from Germany, and, upon receipt of same, erasing brands and re-branding with American marks.”

Then he adds, “I picked up a knife the other day with an American trademark on it, and found that the foreign mark had not been thoroughly ground off, leaving part of the word ‘Germany’ on it.  By using a magnifying glass you could detect the whole brand.”

So, if this report is accurate then, counterfeiting has been with for a long time. Longer, in fact, than folks have been collecting the knives themselves.

Now for a twist-

Who is to say one of the knives we now call a counterfeit wasn’t “counterfeited” by the very firm we thought a modern-day counterfeiter was trying to make us believe actually made it.  How ’bout that for a twist? 

The point here is cutlery history, albeit it dark, and also to remind us- There is nothing new under the sun.

Advertisements
Published in: on October 14, 2008 at 6:03 am  Comments (2)  
Tags: , , , ,

The URI to TrackBack this entry is: https://cutlerynewsjournal.wordpress.com/2008/10/14/knife-company-history-there-is-nothing-new-under-the-sun/trackback/

RSS feed for comments on this post.

2 CommentsLeave a comment

  1. Hi Scott; I am the mossdancer from AAPK. I found this looking for info on Lamson and Goodnow. I am looking for time period for a trademark The U.S. map with Made in US over the top of it and the typical Lamson and Goodnow Anchor Stamp in the middle of map. Should you know the year or even approx,. I would appreciate garnering some of your knowledge. I currently have an old Chefs 12″ blade knife listed on the ebay. I have suggested it was from around the turn of last century. Should you like to take a peek my username is mossdancerjr.

  2. Hey Mossdancer-
    What an interesting name. How did you come by that name?

    Is there an actual “image” of the US Map? Does it have anything on the map like states/counties/cities (or lack thereof), we could use to date it map? I know this may be bassackwards to how you wanted to do it, but I have virtually no reference material on L&G. BUT, will check when I get back from the knife show I’m at now.

    I’d love to see the L&G trademark if you could email it to me. scottATelephanttoenails.com Replace the AT with the @.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: